Global markets watchdog seeks closer scrutiny of stock exchanges
The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), global securities watchdog on Thursday proposed detailed guidance on how regulators should supervise stock exchanges more closely to negate risks from changes in business practices.
IOSCO, said that
exchanges have increasingly become publicly listed companies over the past two
decades while remaining self-regulatory in some cases.
Bourses have expanded geographically and diversified into technology and data services, IOSCO said in the report, citing partnerships with the likes of Google Cloud and Microsoft as exchanges have moved well beyond their traditional role of listing and trading stocks under a mutualised structure.
In Europe, Brexit has
contributed to the increased cross-border operation of exchanges and other
types of trading venues, it added.
"The market
evolutions have influenced the way exchanges and exchange groups are organised,
which can potentially create new conflicts of interest, as well as operational
and organisational interdependencies," IOSCO said.
"These may give rise
to potential risks and challenges concerning the regulatory functions and
responsibilities of exchanges, as well as supervisory issues."
In some exchange groups
with multiple boards, directors sit on several of the boards; a practice known
as dual-hatting to cut costs and complexity.
However, this practice
could impair the ability of board members to act in the best interest of each
exchange they serve, especially when there are diverging or competing interests
within the exchange group or with shareholders, IOSCO said.
The report proposes six
"good practices" for regulators to assess how exchanges are
structured to ensure independence in the way bourses discharge their regulatory
obligations, ensuring that controls are maintained at the level of each
individual exchange in a group.
Regulators
should also ensure adequate monitoring of the activities of multinational
exchange groups operating in their jurisdiction, it added.

No comments